Skip to main content

About your Search

20131202
20131210
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)
. the notion that u.s. companies by aning hurt i this nsa program is a great concern to the u.s. economy when you have politicians talking about how they want more of the economy to look at the big tech company. the tech companies think this is ability to grow businesses internationally. >> how do you think the white house will respond to this? is an open question. this white house has really been dragging their heels on concerns that people have raised about national security. trying to build out the infrastructure. whether businesses have more sway in the white house, traditionally has always been the case. we will see if these companies forget the industry. some of the biggest companies in the world are signing these. those companies, one would imagine, would have a lot of swipe. cory johnson, editor-at- large, thank you. i want to bring in michelle she focuses one cyber and government transparency issues like the foreign surveillance act. she joins us from washington, d.c. it a little ironic given that many of the technology companies have been cooperating? is this just political posturin
next year, we will see action on it. said he is tobama get the nsa to impose self- restraint. let's take a listen. >> i will be proposing some tof-restraint on the nsa and initiate some reform to give people were confidence. i wanted everybody to be clear -- the people at the nsa generally are looking out for the safety of the american people and not interested in reading your e-mails and not interested in reading your text messages. >> president obama speaking on hardball. what kind of reforms do you imagine the president is talking about? >> the way he phrases it as self-restraint will not be enough. the nsa internally has privacy rules that it violates on a regular basis. it cannot be trusted to police itself. that is not how our democracy works. the most important thing and that we hold the white house and congress will endorse is changing the statutes and rules that they cannot collect information on everyday americans not suspected of doing anything wrong. this what -- if you would say. how would the government and nsa protect us if everything is transparent? them toy is cal
nsa data center in utah where the nsa is building a physical facility to do the kinds of computing that has never been seen before as part of this amazing wired magazine story. is that really what we are looking at? the best tech minds against the best tech company? >> something like that with a big data center, the assumption is that there's going to be an ability to crack encryption on a very large scale. that is what one of the microsoft protections is actively trying to work against. the idea of enabling this thing that they are calling perfect full room secrecy is going to make it difficult to encrypt traffic. with this perfect secrecy, that is no longer going to be possible. that makes the impact of cracking any key, whether it is hotmail or gmail much less impactful for the average consumer. it makes to cracking a lot more difficult to do. >> as far as big businesses that are facing this problem, i understand why anyone is concerned, it seems to me that the kind of information they want will most likely be found on facebook. >> i think the information -- it is the aggregatio
are seeing it move in that direction. >> there is a data in utah where the nsa is opening a physical facility to do the kinds of -- and crippling that has never been seen before. is that what we are looking at, the best tech minds of the best tech companies? >> something like that, with the big data centers, the assumption is they are going to be cracking encryption on a large scale. that is what one microsoft encryption is working against. the idea of perfect forward secrecy is going to make it difficult. if i was capturing all your traffic that was encrypted over five years hoping i would ea --e to one day crack the key one day be able to crack the key, that is something that was possible before. with this secrecy that is no longer possible. that makes the impact of cracking any key much less for the consumer. makes it more difficult to do. >> i understand why microsoft is concerned. the kind of information they want might he found on facebook. of alls the aggregation the information, whether it is e-mail or facebook. it is all of that metadata put that creates an overall picture of the ind
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)